Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joseph Carl Bailey, Junior
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. EdJohnston (talk) 03:29, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Joseph Carl Bailey, Junior (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
More or less unsourced article about an independent wrestler from a small semi-professional league, doesn't appear to pass WP:ATHLETE (if that even applies to pro wrestling due to the entertainment aspect of the "sport"), most of the article reads like the back of a trading card. He is asserted to have been involved with a somewhat high profile arrest, but even if this could be verified, he would still(assuming he isn't notable per above) fail WP:BLP1E Mister Senseless™ (Speak - Contributions) 22:21, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Actually, there is a guideline about pro-Wrestlers, looks like he fails this. Mister Senseless™ (Speak - Contributions) 20:13, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Assuming you mean "Athletes: Wrestlers in tiny wrestling leagues are not notable.", how would people define "tiny". Although I agree that the article needs a lot of work, Bailey has worked for Combat Zone Wrestling and IWA Mid-South, neither of which I would consider to be "tiny"--Apsouthern (talk) 11:44, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Actually, there is a guideline about pro-Wrestlers, looks like he fails this. Mister Senseless™ (Speak - Contributions) 20:13, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 14:34, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 20:48, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No eveidence of notability - Nabla (talk) 12:24, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Article is terrible. PepsiPlunge13™ 22:03, 23 May 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by PepsiPlunge13 (talk • contribs)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.